Monday, November 7, 2011
– Lancaster, CA
Sunday, November 13, 2011 pm – Bellflower, CA
Evidences for the Existence of God
In Psalm 14:1, David said through inspiration some 3000 years
ago, “The fool has said in his
heart there is no God.” It is not a pleasant thing to call someone a
fool (nor is it always the wise approach), but it is the conclusion one
reaches when he sees foolishness in the arguments one makes to explain
away something he refuses to accept.
That is what we often see when one denies the existence of God.
David’s concern was with those who rejected God and His counsel.
My assignment tonight is to give an answer to one the Bible
calls a fool. This is a very
relevant topic in light of the assault against God, and in particular
the God of the Bible, which is so prevalent around us. Man in his wisdom
has reasoned away His existence and the accountability that comes with a
personal God. He has appealed to science, his logic, inconsistencies
with those who believe in God, and often his desire to do what he wants
to do. But it is a subject
for which there are answers if we have a good and honest heart.
The challenge in dealing with the atheist or the agnostic (one
who says that the existence of God is less logical than His
non-existence) is to find those whose heart will weigh the evidence with
the realization that they could be wrong and to honestly consider every
side of the argument.
It has been said, and I contend, that it requires a strong faith to be an atheist. One of the sources I have consulted in this study is a book entitled, “I don’t have enough faith to be an Atheist” by Norman Geisler and Frank Turek. The authors make compelling arguments from science, the nature of man and the Bible which present conclusive evidence as to why we ought to live with the assurance that God is AND that the ONE TRUE God is revealed in the pages of the Bible. In our lesson this evening we are going to tap into some of these areas as we briefly make a case for the existence of God.
I.
Natural Laws that Argue
the Existence of God –
a.
The Cosmological argument – is an argument for a first cause for the universe.
In simple terms, this argument states that based upon scientific
laws (which demonstrate that time, space and matter had a beginning),
someone or something had to start it all.
In other words, there had to be a cause.
Scientists rely upon this basic premise every day in every experiment
they conduct. In fact,
much of science is about finding what the cause is of whatever is being
studied. Some of the
scientific evidence includes:
i.
The universe is expanding – thanks to advances in astronomy including super-powerful
telescopes such as the Hubble telescope we have been able to see that
the universe consists of many galaxies that are constantly and
consistently moving further apart. If
it is expanding there had to be at some point in times past – a “ground
zero” or a starting point when everything was together.
Scientists (including materialists – who believe matter is
eternal) call this the big bang.
While we don’t have time to argue when the “big bang” occurred,
it concludes that our universe had a beginning (i.e. for many they claim
that something came out of nothing). My question is: What was before
that beginning? All the atheist or naturalist can do is guess what was
there BEFORE that. We believe that God CAUSED the universe.
Now answer this: Which of these possibilities requires faith?
(The answer is BOTH).
ii.
Laws of energy – the 2nd law of thermodynamics
is a law that states that while energy cannot be either created or
destroyed (1st law of thermodynamics – the amount of energy
is constant) it is constantly deteriorating over time (we understand
deterioration with everything we own). In
other words, the universe is using up its usable energy.
Science says that eventually all the energy in the universe will
be used up and will die (3rd law of thermodynamics which says
that the universe is slowly cooling and will eventually reach absolute
zero).
Because of this, there had to be some point at which energy was as its
maximum capacity – i.e. a BEGINNING, where someone CAUSED energy to
begin to deteriorate.
Question: Based upon the
laws of energy, if matter is eternal (and there is nothing outside of
the natural) why has it not yet been used up?
Anytime an argument is made for eternity within the natural
realm, there is the dilemma one faces when you ask, “What was before
that?”
iii.
Is matter eternal?
Without a plausible explanation, many atheistic scientists say
that matter is eternal. But
they certainly cannot prove it with science.
In fact the above laws contradict that premise.
The existence of an intelligent being outside of the natural realm is
the best explanation for this first cause – God fits this premise.
In fact, that is what Genesis 1:1
says, “In the beginning God create
the heavens and the earth.”
The word for “create” is from the Hebrew, “Bara” which means to
create something. The TWOT[1]
distinguishes this word from “yasar” which means to fashion which
involves the shaping of an object while the first word emphasizes the
initiation of the object. In
other words, it means to create something from nothing.
This is MORE plausible in that
it provides an explanation OUTSIDE of the natural scientific realm.
iv.
The concept of eternity presents problems to the one who denies the
existence of God.
Anytime a scientist says that something natural is eternal he
runs into problems that natural process or science cannot explain.
But yet man KNOWS that something is eternal.
His logical mind says so.
Is it matter or is it something outside of this realm?
One might ask, “Who
made God?”
How can you prove He is eternal?
We can’t prove it with science because the spiritual realm of God
is outside the natural realm.
Which is why the concept of an all-powerful, intelligent being is
MORE plausible than saying matter is eternal.
A friend that works with my son Joshua at Chick-fil-a in dealing with
this subject quoted apologist Charlie Campbell who said: “If nothing cannot produce something, and yet something exists, then it
follows necessarily that something has always existed (in order to bring
the something into existence). Think of it this way: If there ever was a
time that absolutely nothing existed, nothing would exist now. Something
exists now therefore, there was never a time in which nothing existed.
So to answer the question, Who made God? No one. God is eternal and does
not need a maker. The universe is not eternal and does require a
maker.”[2]
The Bible also explains this.
In Ecclesiastes 3:10-11 Solomon wrote, “I
have seen the God-given task with which the sons of men are to be
occupied. 11 He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also He has
put eternity in their hearts, except that no one can find out the work
that God does from beginning to end.”
Psalm 90:2 says, “Before the
mountains were brought forth, Or ever You had formed the earth and the
world, Even from everlasting to everlasting, You are God.”
b.
The Teleological
argument
– Design demands a designer.
i.
Romans 1:20
says, “For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes
are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His
eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse.”
Paul’s point in this verse is
to say that if one looks around, the existence of God becomes clearly
evident as one observes creation.
As the processes of science have improved (shall we say evolved)
we find more and more evidence for intelligent design within creation.
Let’s consider this for a few moments.
ii.
Have you ever ridden in a car? Do you watch a television or listen to a
radio? Do you own a Bible? Have you ever turned on a switch as you
entered a room and it lit up?
Do you own a watch so that you can tell time?
Do you have a computer? We could go on with multitudes of
questions like this. What do
they all have in common? They would not exist if someone did not design
them. We KNOW that for a
fact.
iii.
The story is told that Sir Isaac Newton who was an
adamant believer in God once had a series of discussions with an atheist
about the existence of God.
After several failed attempts to change his friend’s mind, he went to a
carpentry shop and had the owner build him a to scale model of the
universe with great detail.
The next time his friend came to his house, he saw the model on the
center of a table. Admiring
it, the friend asked, WHO made it.
Newton’s answered that no one made it.
It just appeared. The
friend refused to believe it so Newton finally explained why he did what
he did. Design DEMANDED a designer.[3]
iv.
Our universe is no different.
The universe is very orderly in so many different ways.
In fact, science relies on order
and consistency of natural law to learn and formulate factual
conclusions.
v.
When we consider the complexity of the various elements of this earth,
we see order. When we look
at the human body we see order.
When we look at the universe, we see order.
In every other area of study
order means there is design behind it, e.g. archaeology, forensics,
copyright & patent laws, etc.
Why is the universe any different?
vi.
Consider the placement and complexity of our earth.
The size of the earth is just right.
If it were larger or smaller, it could not support our atmosphere
which is necessary for life.
If it were any closer to or further away from the sun, the earth would
be too cold or hot. The
earth is tilted at the right angle, if it were not then water would flow
to the poles and stay there – in the middle would be vast desserts.
The earth is rotating at the right speed (ca. 1000 mph),
circulating around the sun at the right speed (70k mph), etc.
If the rotation of the earth
around the sun were halved seasons would be twice as long and unable to
support life. If the
rotation speed were doubled the earth could not grow enough food to feed
its population.
And the moon is in just the right place (240K miles away) to circulate
our water and restrain their boundaries.
If the moon were 1/5 closer tides would be so large that twice a
day there would be great flooding over most of the earth’s surface.[4]&
[5]
The rate of oxygen in the atmosphere of the earth is 21%.
If it were 25%, fires would erupt spontaneously.
IF it were 15% humans would suffocate.
It is at just the right level.[6]
All of these things make life possible and show a Creator/designer
behind our existence.
Have you ever considered how complex the various systems of the human
body are? The nervous
system, respiratory system, circulatory system, reproductive system,
etc, all work together to make the human body.
That many details would be impossible without a designer.
Buddy Payne, (a chemist,
mathematician and apologist) noted that there are some 150 elements
necessary to sustain life in the universe.
There is no other known planet that comes even close to the earth
in the viable ability to sustain life.
Scientists are desperately trying to find something, but they
have NOTHING!
vii.
David in
Psalm 139:14 said, “I
will praise You, for I am fearfully and wonderfully made.
Marvelous are your works, and that my soul knows very well.”
viii.
DNA, demonstrates a
mechanism through which information is disseminated in an orderly
fashion that causes living things to function.
It is said that the information contained in one strand of DNA is
equivalent to 10,000 encyclopedias.
Where there is organized information there is ALWAYS a designer
coordinating that information.
ix.
There are too many details in this universe and on earth to deny the
creator of it all.
Psalm 19:1 says,
“The heavens declare the glory of
God, and the firmament shows His handiwork.”
c.
The origin of life
i.
Evolution generally teaches that life originated from inorganic matter.
If there is no creator, than one must believe that life
originated from an inorganic (non-living) source.
ii.
While this is a subject addressed with evolution, it is also a key
argument for the existence of God.
As science has evolved and advanced, scientists have continually
sought to create life in a test-tube. And the subject of the origin of
life continues to plague the scientific community that wants to deny the
existence of God.
In 2003, (11/11) the NY Times published an article entitled, “How did
life begin?”
The article began, “The origin of life is biology’s
most daunting problem.” In the article we read, “Some progress is being
made at reconstructing the process that led to the first living cells.
But it consists of conjectures of varying plausibility, not
proof.” The article proceeds
to describe that it was probably the result of “a natural chemical
reaction that repeated itself.”
But in the end, there is no conclusive answer.
In fact the article concludes by saying, “Researchers are a long
way from reconstructing any plausible path to the origin of life.
But they have not given up.
And they always conclude, no matter how fragmentary their
evidence, that life is possible.”[7]
How truly sad. Many
scientists REFUSE to consider that life originated from an intelligent
source OUTSIDE of the boundaries of science.
iii.
The origin of life (i.e. its cause) cannot be explained with scientific
laws. You CANNOT create life
from inorganic matter. You
may understand the composition of a living thing, but that still doesn’t
create life.
Let’s take the example of a single seed – With advancements in the study
of DNA, micro-biology, chemistry and other sciences, science can
accurately determine the chemical and biological structure of just about
anything. Let’s say science
determines the structure and chemical composition of a peanut.
They may be able to assemble all the elements and components of
that single seed. It may
look identical, feel identical and taste identical, perhaps even to the
point that you cannot tell it apart from the real peanut.
BUT, when all is said and done, when they plant it – NOTHING will
happen. There is that “spark
of life” in the “real thing” that science cannot create or duplicate.
iv.
And when science says that life originated from inorganic matter, they
are talking about a so-called simple life form (such as an amoeba – a
single celled organism or maybe a protein which is simply a component of
a cell and DNA). That still
doesn’t explain HOW that simple life form evolved into complex life
forms such as a peanut, animal or human being.
v.
An interesting thought: In one source I consulted in this study the
statement was made that even if science could eventually create life
(and he was NOT saying they could) it would be interesting to note that
such a creation required INTELIGENCE to do it!
So to create life would in itself make a case FOR God.
vi.
The Bible says, “And the Lord God
formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the
breath of life; and man became a living being.” Gen 2:7
vii.
When you see life, no matter how small or great, you see an argument
for the existence of God.
Consider the faith an atheist has to have to say that life just
happened. That it came from
inorganic matter and thereby reject the intelligent designer.
II.
The Nature of God Within
Us - Moral Laws that Argue His existence
a.
Even beyond the laws of
science dealing with the universe and life, there are characteristics of
human beings that cannot be explained by nature.
b.
What is the meaning of
life? The fact that man
asks, “Why am I here” is not “natural.” You can’t explain it in a
laboratory or in the laws of nature.
There is nothing else in nature that makes this inquiry.
c.
There are also many logical considerations better answered by
acknowledging God rather than denying Him.
The biological, evolutionary process cannot explain:
i.
The highly developed
intelligence of man. This
includes our ability to carry on intelligible conversations with one
another or to debate subjects such as this
ii.
Our craving for
knowledge so that we can improve
iii.
The conscience,
emotions, virtue, and even faith itself, etc.
All evolutionary science
can say is, “It happened over time.”
d.
The fact of morality –
i.
Exact standards of
morality differ throughout the world, but there are certain general
moral principles that EVERY civilized society understands, such as you
cannot indiscriminately kill other humans just for kicks and a need to
respect certain boundaries for others.
ii.
So WHO determined what is moral and not moral?
There is a standard inherent within us.
Some have called it, “a sense of ought”.
That is there are things we naturally know we ought to do and
ought not to do. How did we
get that sense? Nature
cannot explain this!
iii.
What is interesting is that such reasoning is not existent in other forms
of life.
Animals may respect territories and such, but it is purely
natural, based upon their survival and primitive.
There is no evidence, scientific or otherwise to say they have a
conscience of right and wrong.
iv.
But where did our developed morality come from?
A moral standard requires a source greater than ourselves to whom we are
accountable.
IF not, WHO determines right and wrong?
IF we are just creatures of chance, then how can there be any moral
standards? Even humanists,
some of who say there is no absolute morality (they deny the existence
of God, etc.) set standards of decency in dealing with others.
Humanism says you should not do things that interfere with the
personal rights of others. I
ask, WHY? If there is
nothing beyond this life, why not live totally for yourself?
Isn’t that the law of nature – survival of the fittest?
v.
For those who deny
absolute morality, we ask: What would they do if their child is killed
by a drunk driver (whose moral standard permits him to drink and drive)
or someone steals their possessions.
What made the holocaust wrong - IF there is no absolute morality?
Why was Hitler so bad? What is the big deal about Muslim
extremists who believe they should kill anyone who will not submit? Why
should we condemn the warlords in Africa who are engaged in genocide?
If this world is nothing but a part of the natural process of
evolution (here only for a few billion years) why not live for
ourselves?
One might say, so that we can live
in peace. But why?
Who gives you the right to make that decision for someone else?
e.
All things that makes
man who he is in contrast to nature cry for the existence of God.
i.
The Bible gives us an
answer – Gen. 1:27 which says, “So God created man in his own image; in the image of God He created him;
male and female He created them.”
ii.
Paul in 1 Cor. 15:19
said, “If in this life only we
have hope in Christ, we are of all men most pitiable.”
We know this text speaks of the resurrection, but in so doing it
makes a point to the atheist who denies God and anything beyond this
life.
Rom. 14:10-12 says that we will all stand before God one day and give an
account. This explains WHY
God gave us a sense of morality.
III.
Concluding Thoughts:
a.
We could say so much
more about this subject. You
do not have to look very far to see that there had to be an intelligent
being who created this world.
Remember again Romans 1:20, “For
since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly
seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal
power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse”
b.
By faith, I believe that
intelligent being is the God of the Bible. Psalm 33:6-9 says, “By the word of the Lord the heavens were made, And all the host of them
by the breath of His mouth. He gathers the waters of the sea together as
a heap; He lays up the deep in storehouses. Let all the earth fear the
Lord; Let all the inhabitants of the world stand in awe of Him.
For He spoke, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast.”
c.
Does our belief in God
require faith? Absolutely!
Heb. 11:3 & 6 says so!
d.
But what about atheism?
Does it require faith?
ABSOLUTELY!
i.
Often times, the atheist
mocks the Christian’s faith calling it a crutch or fantasy.
While our belief in God IS by faith, it is NOT a blind faith, as
we have seen some examples of in this lesson.
ii.
But consider the faith
an atheist must have. He may
not call it faith, nor define it as Christians do, but there are many
things he believes and accepts by the same standards that we would call
faith. There are many things he
accepts without scientific or natural proof.
AND he bases his eternity upon these things.
In fact, he must accept many things by faith:
1.
That God does not exist
(which he cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt)
2.
That matter is either
eternal or created itself (both of which are contrary to natural
laws)
3.
That life originated
from inorganic matter spontaneously
4.
That order and design
are the result of accidents which are contrary to laws of nature that
science depends upon to learn
5.
That our morals and
conscience are the product of natural selection, i.e. it evolved.
But with all our advances, science still cannot explain the
“cause” of the mind.
6.
That man created the
idea of God because he wanted something greater than himself to worship
– Note: About 84% of the world believes in some sort of deity[8]
7.
That he will not have to
give an account for his life when it is over
e.
Note: I have peppered
this lesson with Bible verses because I want us to KNOW that the Bible
has answers to some of the questions we have posed that science CANNOT
answer. The skeptic
may not like the answer or the Bible itself, but it is there.
If you can prove that the Bible is more than a fairy tale you can
begin to show that there are plausible answers, BEYOND the natural
realm. Such does NOT
contradict science. And that
is why we study the word of God for answers.
Truly, there is much evidence for the existence of God.
We have just scratched the surface.
The atheist may not accept these points as valid, but that
doesn’t change the truth of the points that we have made.
The atheist may mock the believer or try to discourage you from
following the Bible. But
know that your faith, while not based upon the five senses, is NOT a
blind faith. In fact,
overwhelmingly, the evidence of science and nature verifies the
existence of God rather than denying it.
Many of the things that we cannot explain naturally make sense
when we believe in God. May
these things strengthen our resolve to serve Him rather than reject Him.
“But without faith it is
impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He
is and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.”
(Heb. 11:6) Do you have the
hope of a reward beyond this life?
If not, let me invite you to obey the gospel today.
[1]
Bara, (Strong’s OT: 1254)
Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament, ©1980, The Moody
Bible Institute.
Via, Biblesoft.
[2] Campbell,
Charlie; Quick
Responses to Skeptics, “What Evidence Do You Have That There
Is A God?” http://www.alwaysbeready.com/
[6] Geisler,
N. L., & Turek, F. (2004). I don't have enough faith to be an
atheist. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.
P98.
[8]
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adherents.html